مطالعه‌ی تحلیلی انواع صناعات و مشاغل در نگاره‌ی پادشاهی جمشید در شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی، رشته‌ی تاریخ تطبیقی و تحلیلی هنر اسلامی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران.

2 استادیار، دکترای تخصصی، گروه هنر، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

10.22051/pgr.2021.34803.1098

چکیده

هنر نگارگری هم بازنمای غنای هنر ایرانی است و هم اهمیتی تاریخی در بازجست مسائل فرهنگی و اجتماعی سرزمین ایران دارد. شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری یکی از نسخه‌های مهم و زیبا و موضوع پادشاهی جمشید هم یکی از 22 نگاره‌ی این نسخه می‌باشد. از آن‌جا که جمشید شاه از نخستین پادشاهانی است که در گسترش فرهنگ و تمدن ایران نقش مهمی داشته است و روایاتی از حکومت و عملکرد او در متن شاهنامه‌ی فردوسی آمده و صحنه‌های از حکومت او در نسخه‌ی شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری نیز به تصویر درآمده است؛ بنابراین ضرورت ایجاب نموده است تا شناخت انواع صناعات در نگاره‌ی پادشاهی جمشید در شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری و شناسایی چگونگی بازنمایی این مشاغل به عنوان هدف پژوهش مورد بررسی قرار بگیرد. در این‌راستا سؤالات زیر مطرح می‌شود: 1- چه مشاغل و صناعاتی در نگاره‌ی پادشاهی جمشید در شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری تصویرسازی شده است؟ 2- مشاغل و صناعات مختلف در نگاره‌ی پادشاهی جمشید در شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری با چه ویژگی‌هایی و چگونه به تصویر درآمده‌اند؟ پژوهش پیش‌رو به شیوه‌ی توصیفی- تحلیلی انجام شده و داده‌های آن با جست‌وجو در منابع کتابخانه‌ای جمع‌آوری شده است و نتایج نشان می‌دهد که براساس متن شاهنامه ساخت ابزارآلات جنگی، نرم کردن آهن، پارچه‌بافی و خیاطی در نگاره بازتاب یافته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analytical study of types of professions and crafts in the Jamshid’s kingdom miniature in Baysonqor’s Shahnameh

نویسندگان [English]

  • sahar zekavat 1
  • Abdolreza chareie 2
1 PhD student of Comparative and analytical history of Islamic art, Faculty of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

 
Analytical study of types of professions and crafts in the Jamshid’s kingdom miniature in Baysonqor’s Shahnameh
 
Abstract
 
Persian miniature art represents the enrichment of Iranian art and it also has a historical significance in the cultural and social subjects. The Shahnameh of Baysonghor Mirza is one of the most important and beautiful manuscripts and it belongs to the Timurid period and it is the result of the efforts of Herat school Painters In the art workshop of Baysonghor Mirza. This manuscript was prepared and illustrated in 833 AH by the order of Baysonghor Mirza, son of Shahrokh and grandson of Timur Gurkhani and it has 22 paintings written by Molana Jafar Tabrizi. Also the painters ofBaysonqor’s Shahnameh are Master Amir Khalil and Master Ghiyas al-ddin (same as Pir Ahmad or Seyyed Ahmad) and Master Khajeh Ali Illuminated it and Master Ghavam al-Din also made its cover. Baysonqor’s Shahnameh is kept in the library of Golestan Palace in Tehran and the number and size of this manuscript pages are 690 pages and 384 by 265 mm and its diameter is 75 mm, respectively. It is necessary to mention that Jamshid's kingdom is one of the 22 miniatures in this Shahnameh of Baysonghor manuscript. Also Jamshid Shah is one of the first kings to play an important role in the deployment of Iranian culture and civilization and the text of the Shahnameh narrates his Empire and function and scenes of his government have been illustrated in the Baysonqor’s Shahnameh. Therefore, it seems necessary to study the identification of the types of artifacts and Persepolis in the Jamshid’s kingdom miniature in Baysonqor’s Shahnameh and to recognition how Illustration these professions and crafts as a research purpose. In Ferdowsi Shahnameh, Jamshid Shah is introduced as the greatest and most powerful Pishdadi king and son of Tahmorath and a prominent example of idealistic king in Iranshahr and it is one of the most original myths of India and Iran. Jamshid Shah is the only person in Avesta except Zoroaster who speaks face to face with ahura mazda. His era is one of the most brilliant mythological periods in Iran and during the reign of Jamshid Shah, there was no death, disease, cold or heat in the world for three hundred years. Jamshid Shah has established the great and annual Nowruz among Iranians and many aspects of human civilization have been attributed to Jamshid Shah. He was the first to make weapons such as helmet, armor and sword. He has also developed techniques and occupations such as textile weaving, house building, shipbuilding, medicine, and the extraction of precious stones from mountains and the sea, as well as the extraction of metals from mines. It should be added that Jamshid tried to increase the level of public health and hygiene. Achieving Gholab, uod and amber and building roads and developing cities are other functions of Jamshid Shah. He also established the four social classes and levels. Therefore the present study was done to answer these questions: 1- What professions and crafts have been depicted in the Jamshid’s kingdom miniature in Baysonqor’s Shahnameh? 2-What are the Properties of types of professions and crafts in the Jamshid’s kingdom miniature in Baysonqor’s Shahnameh and how are these crafts portrayed? It should be noted this research is a descriptive - analytical study and its data and information were collected by searching in the library, documentary and visual resources. Findings show that in the painting of Jamshid kingdom in Baysonqor’s Shahnameh, Jamshid Shah is sitting on a throne and he is wearing gloves and is exchanging the hunting bird and around him there are craftsmen and artisans, each engaged in a specific industry and activity. The text of Shahnameh shows that Jamshid Shah during his rule has expanded some jobs and aspects of civilization and culture such as making war tools (helmets, armor and war clothing), softening iron, weaving linen, silk and Ghez hair and producing Diba and fur, sewing clothes, promoting agriculture, expanding architecture and building houses, baths and palaces From stone and gypsum materials, extraction of gems and precious stones, production of fragrant aromas such as ban, camphor, pure mushk, uod and amber and Gholab, medicine and treatment of diseases, as well as ship building. Comparison of the mentioned cases with the details of the picture shows that the cases of making war tools (helmet, armor and war coat), softening iron, weaving of linen, silk and Ghez hair and producing Diba and fur, sewing clothes in the picture Illustrated and promoting agriculture, expansion of architecture and building of houses, baths and palaces from stone and gypsum materials, extraction of gems and precious stones, production of aromas such as ban, camphor, pure mushk, uod and amber and Gholab, medicine And the treatment of diseases as well as shipbuilding is not seen in the picture of painting. Also it should be noted that Jamshid Shah is seen exchanging the hunting bird, which shows the expansion of the bird-hunting training industry during the Timurid period and Ferdowsi has not mentioned this issue in the text of Shahnameh. Also it can be seen a person in the painting who has a bag such as a letter bag on his waist and the text of the poems does not mention the development of writing or correspondence. Regarding the details of the illustrated industries and occupations, it should be added that the making of war tools in the text of the poems is used with the phrase making helmets, armor and war clothing, which can be seen craftsmen working with hammers and Special engraving tools in the picture of painting and a helmet can be seen on the ground next to one of the craftsmen was hammering. Also there are tools such as metal cutting scissors and a metalworking toolbox. In the case of iron softening, the illustrator depicts these cases by picture a metal smelting furnace, a blower machine to increase the temperature of the furnace, and a person working with the blower machine. In the lower part of painting, two people are depicted hammering and shaping the metal and so-called softening it and the weaving of the cloth is also shown in the form of a weaving machine and a spinning machine and The sewing job is also seen as a person cutting the cloth and another person sewing the cloth. It should be noted that the industrial arts in the Timurid period, the Timurid princes had grown up in a knowledgeable and artistic environment and after Timur Gurkhani, they cultivated art and encouraged and gathered artists and craftsmen in their territory in Transoxiana, Khorasan, Iraq and other regions. Baysonghor Mirza Bahadur Khan was the grandson of Timur Gurkhani and the third child of Shahrukh after Elegh Beyg and Ibrahim Sultan and according to historical documents, he was an educated person, artist, art lover and litterateur. During the reign of Baysonghor Mirza, Developed the literature and poetry and the arts such as painting, calligraphy and writing, bookbinding, goldsmith , carpentry, blacksmithing, pottery, textile weaving, gardening and architectural arts such as inscriptions technique and wooden arts such as inlaying and expansion of the bird-hunting training. A comparison of the details of painting with the occupations and industries of the Timurid period shows that the painter did not mention gardening, bookbinding, calligraphy and writing, goldsmith, carpentry, pottery and architecture, and the art of inlaying and also, in the details of the painting, Jamshid Shah is Illustrated exchanging a bird-hunting and this shows that the painting emphasizes the skill of Jamshid Shah in Training birds-hunting and hunting with birds of prey and in this painting, the painter Illustrated the job and industry of the bird-hunting training from the common occupations of the Timurid period and painter from the common industries of his time, he only illustrated occupations such as the bird-hunting training, smelting metals, blacksmithing and making helmet, spinning and weaving cloth, dressmaking.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Key words: Jamshid’s kingdom
  • Baysonqor’s Shahnameh
  • professions
  • crafts
  • miniatures
احمدی توانا، اکرم، (1393)، «بررسی بینامتنی نگاره‌ی پادشاهی جمشید از شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری»، باغ نظر، سال 11، شماره‌ی 28، 54- 47.
اردستانی رستمی، حمیدرضا، (1396)، «تیامت میان‌دورودی (بین‌النهرین)، جمشید و ضحاک»، تاریخ‌نامه‌ی خوارزمی، سال 5، شماره‌ی 20، 39- 13.
انصاری، مجتبی، (1390)، باغ ایرانی، زبان مشترک منظر در ایران و هند، منظر، دوره 3، شماره 13، 11- 6.  
ایزدی، عباس، احمدپناه، سید ابوتراب، (1395)، «بررسی تطبیقی عناصر بصری نگاره‌های دربار جمشید و دربار فریدون در شاهنامه‌ی طهماسبی با تأکید بر ترکیب‌بندی نگاره‌ها»، نگره، دوره‌ی 11، شماره‌ی 38، 78- 60.
آذری، علاء‌الدین، (1387)، «پژوهشی در زمینه‌ی اساطیر مشترک ایران و هند»، فصل‌نامه‌ی علمی پژوهشی تاریخ، سال 3، شماره‌10، 26- 5.
بیکمرادی، نرگس، (1387)، «بررسی تطبیقی فرم و رنگ در دو نگاره‌ی: به بند کشیدن ضحاک در شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری و شاهنامه‌ی شاه طهماسبی»، فصل‌نامه‌ی هنر، شماره‌ی 77، 260- 242.
پرنیان، موسی، بهمنی، شهرزاد، (1391)، «بررسی و تحلیل نمادهای بخش اساطیری شاهنامه»، متن‌شناسی ادب فارسی، سال 4، شماره‌ی 1، 110- 91.
جمشیدی، فرخ‌لقا، (1393)، بررسی اوضاع اقتصادی و اجتماعی خراسان در عصر شاهرخ تیموری، پایان‌نامه‌ مقطع کارشناسی ارشد، رشته تاریخ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان.
جهان‌دار، حوریه. (1395). مطالعه و شناسایی جنبه بیانگری نگاره‌هایی از شاهنامه ابراهیم‌سلطان و محمد جوکی با تکیه بر ویژگی‌های اجتماعی و هنری، پایان‌نامه‌ مقطع کارشناسی ارشد پژوهش هنر، دانشکده علوم نظری و مطالعات عالی هنر، دانشگاه هنر تهران.
حسینی، سید رضا، ذکاوت، سحر، (1399)، مطالعه تحلیلی تصاویر پرندگان شکاری در نگاره‌های شاهنامه طهماسبی، نگره، دوره 15، شماره 53، 69- 51.
دیماند، موریس‌اسون؛ (1365)، راهنمای صنایع دستی، ترجمه عبدالله فریار، چاپ دوم، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.  
سمرقندی، کمال‌الدین عبدالرزاق، (1383)، مطلع‌السعدین و مجمع‌البحرین، به اهتمام عبدالحسین نوایی، جلد 2 و 3، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
شراتو، امبرتو، گروبه، ارنست، (1384)، هنر ایلخانی و تیموری، ترجمه: یعقوب آژند، چاپ دوم، تهران: مولی.
فردوسی، ابوالقاسم، (1391)، شاهنامه‌ی حکیم ابوالقاسم فردوسی، به تصحیح پژمان پورحسین، نسخه‌ی پی‌دی‌اف www.takbook.com.
کنبای، شیلا. (1380). نگارگری ایرانی، ترجمه‌: مهناز شایسته‌فر، تهران: موسسه مطالعات هنر اسلامی.
لطیفیان، نارملا، شایسته‌فر، مهناز، (1381)، «بررسی ویژگی‌ها و مطالعه‌ی تطبیقی نگاره‌های ایرانی در دوران تیموری و صفوی (دوشاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری- شاه طهماسبی)»، دوفصل‌نامه‌ی مدرس هنر، دوره‌ی 1، شماره‌ی 2، 66- 55.
مبینی، مهتاب، شاه‌وردی، امین، (1397)، نگارگری ایران فراتر از نظریات، گرافیک نقاشی، دوره 1، شماره 1، 60- 51.
میرجعفری، حسین. (1379)، تاریخ تحولات سیاسی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی و فرهنگی ایران در دوره‌ی تیموریان و ترکمانان، اصفهان: انتشارات دانشگاه اصفهان.
میرخواند، محمد بن خاوندشاه بن محمود، (1375)، روضه‌الصفا فی سیره الانبیاء و الملوک و الخفاء، تهذیب و تلخیص عباس زریاب، جلد 3 و 6، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
ندرلو، مصطفی، پورعلی‌اکبر، مریم، (1386)، «بررسی ساختار تصویری و طراحی (دیزاین) کتب کهن شاهنامه‌ی بایسنقری و هفت‌اورنگ جامی»، دوفصل‌نامه‌ی مدرس هنر، دوره‌ی 2، شماره‌ی 2، 93- 77.
واله اصفهانی قزوینی، محمدیوسف، (1379)، خلد برین، به کوشش هاشم محدث، روضه 6، تهران: میراث مکتوب.
یاحقی، محمدجعفر، قائمی، فرزاد، (1386)، «نقد اساطیری شخصیت جمشید از منظر اوستا و شاهنامه»، نشریه‌ی دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، شماره‌ی 21، 305- 273.
یزدی، شرف‌الدین علی، (1336)، ظفرنامه، به تصحیح محمد عباسی، جلد 2، تهران: امیرکبیر. 
یعقوبی هشجین، سید کمال، (1395)، مقایسه اقدامات فرهنگی – هنری ابراهیم سلطان و بایسنقر میرزای تیموری، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، رشته تاریخ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره).  
 
Ahmadi Tavana, A. (2014), An Intertextual Study of Jamshid’s Kingdom painting in Baysonqor’s Shahnama, Bagh- e Nazar, 11(28), 47- 54. 
Ansari, M. (2011), Persian Garden, the common language of landscape architecture in India and Iran, Manzar, 3(13), 6- 11. 
Ardestani Rostami, H. (2017), Tiamat of Mesopotamia (Bina al-Nahreyn), Jamshid and Zahak, Kharazmi History, 5(20), 13- 39.
Azari, A. (2008), Research in the field of common myths of Iran and India, History, 3(10), 5-26.
Bikmoradi, N, (2008), "Comparative study of form and color in two paintings: Zahak's arrest in Baysonghory Shahnameh and Shah Tahmasebi Shahnameh", Art Quarterly, (77), 242- 260.
Canby, Sh. (2001), Persian Painting, Translated by: Mahnaz Shayestefar, Tehran: Institute of Islamic Art Studies.
Dimand, M S. (1986), a handbook of Muhammadan art, translated by Abdullah Faryar, (nd ed2), Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Ferdowsi, A. (2012), Shahnameh of Hakim Abolghasem Ferdowsi, edited by Pezhman Pourhossein, PDF version: www.takbook.com.
Hoseini, S R. Zekavat, S. (2020), an Analytical Study of Images of Birds of Prey in the Miniature Paintings of Tahmasebi Shahnameh, Negareh, 15(53), 51- 69.  
https://abadis.ir/fatofa/%D9%82%D8%B2/ (access date: 2021/05/04).
https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%A8%D8%B1 (access date: 2021/05/04).
https://www.mehremihan.ir/ebook/2788-%D8%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%AA-%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B3%D9%86%D9%82%D8%B1%DB%8C (access date: 2021/05/04).
Izadi, A. Ahmadpanah, S A. (2016), A Comparative Study of the Visual Elements of the images of the Jamshid Court and the Court of Fereydoun in the Tahmasebi's Shahnameh, Emphasizing the Composition of the images, Negareh, 11(38), 78-60.
Jahandar, H. (2016). Study and identification of expressive aspects of the Shahnameh of Ebrahim Sultan and Mohammad Joki based on social and artistic features, Master, Tehran University of Arts.
Jamshidi, F. (2014), A Study of the Economic and Social Situation of Khorasan in the Age of Shahrokh Teymouri, Master Thesis, Lorestan University.
Latifiyan, N. Shayestehfar, M. (2002), A Study of the features and Comparative Study of Iranian Paintings in the Timurid and Safavid Periods (Baysonghor’s and Tahmasp’s Shahnameh), Modarres- e honar, 1(2), 55- 66. 
Mirjafari, H. (2000), History Evolutions of Political, Social, Economic and Cultural in Iran during the Timurid and Turkmen Periods, Isfahan: Isfahan University Press.
Mirkhand, M. (1996), Rozaho al-Safa fi Sira al-Anbiya va al-Muluk va al-Khafa, Refinement and summarization of Abbas Zaryab, Volumes 3 and 6, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Mobini, M. Shahvordi, A. (2018). Persian painting, beyond theories. Painting Graphics, (1), 51- 60.
Naderlo, M. Poraliakbar, M. (2007), the pictorial structure and design of ancient books of Baysonghory Shahnameh and Haft Awrang Heroes", Modarres- e honar, 2(2), 77- 93.
Parnian, M. Bahmani, SH. (2012), Study and analysis of the symbols of the mythological part of Shahnameh, Text ology of Persian literature, 4(1), 91- 110.
Samarghandi, K A. (2004), Matlaa Al-Saadin va Majmaa al-Bahrain, by Abdolhossein Navaii, Volumes 2 and 3, Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Scerrato, U. Grube, E. (2005), Ilkhanid and Timurid Art, translated by Yaghoub Azhand, (nd ed2), Tehran: Molly.
Valeh Esfahani Qazvini, M Y. (200), Khald Barin, by Hashem Mohaddes, Rouzeh 6, Tehran: Written Heritage.
Yaghobi Hashjin, S K. (2016), Comparison of cultural- art activities of  Ibrahim Sultan and Baysonghor Mirza Timurid, Master Thesis, International University of Imam Khomeini (RA).
Yahaghi, M. Ghaemi, F. (2007), Mythological Critique of Jamshid's Personality from the Perspective of Avesta and Shahnameh, Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, (21), 305-273.
 
Yazdi, Sh A. (1957), Zafarnameh, to correct Mohammad Abbasi, Volume 2, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
 
https://abadis.ir/fatofa/%D9%82%D8%B2/ (access date: 2021/05/04).