تبیین تجلی اسطورۀ مکان مقدس در نهاد موزه با تکیه بر آرای میرچا الیاده

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری پژوهش هنر، دانشکده پژوهش‌های عالی هنر و کارآفرینی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران، نویسنده مسئول.

2 کارشناسی ارشد هنر اسلامی (گرایش مطالعات تاریخی و تطبیقی)، دانشکده صنایع‌دستی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

 
مکان در اساطیر دارای جنبه‌های مقدس بوده و از ابعاد معمولی و رایج جداست، پس فهم رمزپردازی یک مکان بیش از هرچیز منوط به فهم ارزش‌گذاری دینی آن و شناخت ساختار و کنش مکان مقدس است. در این ‌بین موزه در نگاه عمومی، مکانی عرفی و در ارتباط با جامعۀ مدرن به نظر می‌رسد، اما جنبه‌های قدسی نیز به خود می‌پذیرد و می‌توان انعکاس برخی از مضامین تقدس‌گونۀ مکان در موزه را با شواهدی در رابطه با تجلی مفهوم «مقدس» از مکان همراه دید که در میان تأملات میرچا الیاده مشاهده می‌شود؛ ازاین‌رو پژوهش حاضر با هدف واکاوی الگوی اسطوره‌شناسانۀ تقدس مکان در نهاد موزه با توجه به آرای الیاده صورت گرفته است. روش پژوهش توصیفی‌تحلیلی و گردآوری مطالب به شیوۀ کتابخانه‌ای است. همچنین سؤال این است که ویژگی‌های قدسی موزه وابسته به الگوی تقدس محور مکان در اسطوره‌شناسی الیاده، کدام‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد همان ‌گونه که الیاده بر تقدس مکان وابسته به ویژگی‌های تجلی امر قدسی، مرکز اتصال‌دهنده، تکرار کهن‌الگوی کیهان‌زایی، تجربۀ زمان آغازین و دارای مرز و گذرگاه تأکید دارد، الگوهای کلی موزه نیز آبستن این ارزش‌ها و خصوصیات بوده و می‌تواند تجربۀ «مکان مقدس» را حتی برای انسان غیرمذهبی احیا کند.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Defining the Manifestation of the Holy Place Myth in the Museum Institution Based on the Views of Mircea Eliade

نویسندگان [English]

  • Neda Kiani Ejgerdi 1
  • Hatam Shirnejadi 2
1 PhD Student in Art Research, Faculty of Higher Research in Art and Entrepreneurship, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
2 Master of Islamic Art (Historical and Comparative Studies), Faculty of Handicrafts, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The myth expresses the ancient man's thought and feeling toward reality and the universe, which was formed in connection with his religious and moral needs. Meanwhile, "place" has sacred aspects in mythology and it is separate from the usual dimensions. Therefore, understanding the encryption of a place depends more than anything on understanding its religious value and knowing the structure and function of the holy place. This is while the attitude of early and religious societies towards the place has been different from the attitude of modern societies; in such a way that the primitive and mythological man sought to create holy places to get rid of the worldly dimensions. But the modern man is far away from the holy place and has fallen into the trap of the secular place. Based on this, in Eliade's thought, "place" is placed in two different fields, holy and secular and any manifestation is considered to be a combination of these two. That is, holiness is also hidden and secret while being revealed; therefore, the existence of an unholy place has never been fully understood, and even the most secular place still preserves traces of the religious value of the world. In addition, he defines the structure and action of the holy place as dependent on the characteristics of the manifestation of the sacred, the connecting center, the repetition of the cosmological archetype, the experience of the beginning time, and having borders and passages. He has dealt with the mentioned subject in detail in two books: 1-Treatise on the History of Religions (1949), which focused on the key concepts of "the center of the universe", "holy place" and "holy time" and 2- The sacred and the profane; the nature of religion (1957), which, in addition to the previous concepts, paid attention to "sanctity of nature" and "human existence and sanctified life".
In the meantime, although in the general view, the museum seems to be a secular place and related to modern society, it accepts sacred aspects and evidence of the manifestation of the concept of a "holy" place can be seen in it, which is visible among Eliade's opinions. The museum is considered as a place that has a foundation in mythology, a temple and a religion (sacred) on one hand, and a modern phenomenon (customary) on the other hand, it includes values and characteristics that can create an exceptional quality for humans. Therefore, the present research, using Eliade's mythological model regarding the "holy place", has paid attention to its analysis of the museum institution and in this way, it brings up the compatibility of the museum institution with this myth. 
The purpose of this research is based on analyzing the mythological model of the sanctity of place in the museum according to Eliade's opinions. Also, the main question is: What are the sacred features of the museum related to the holiness model of place in the mythology of Eliade? The method of the current research is qualitative and descriptive-analytical, and it is formed with a mythological approach. In terms of the goal, it is a type of developmental research and the collection of materials has been done in a library manner. The importance and necessity of research are that the mythological approach in the field of museology can open a new view on it and clarify the position of the museum institution related to holiness in the world of myths. Also, considering the role of the space and place of the museum in the formation of meaning and concepts, the subject of the holiness of the place can play a central role in policies aimed related to the framework and function of the museum; that is, it promotes knowledge and improves planning in the process of museum development and design, the perception and display of works and the experience of visitors. Nowadays, in the architecture of museums, the external volume is important in addition to the internal use, and on the other hand, attention is paid to the internal spaces and their functions, including the activities of the museum curators, museum objects, and its visits and visitors. In addition, it emphasizes the caution in differentiating the sanctification and desanctification of the museum in the contemporary era.  
The results show that, from a mythological point of view, the museum is considered the place and temple of "muses", the place of manifestation of the sacred. Then, since many museums are established in holy places such as temples, churches, mosques, and shrines, they are considered places of holiness. Also, museums can enable the manifestation of the sacred through their objects and collections in three ways: objects with an inherent holiness, objects related to holiness, or an ordinary thing that has been sanctified by entering the museum. Furthermore, in the myth, "muses" are the spiritual link between humans and other worlds; the museum too, being the center of the universe, connects the earth and the sky through its objects and architectural structure as the axis of the world; either symbolically or in appearance. More precisely, the museum reminds us of the sky, and since all cultures seek to conquer this sky, they consider it a holy origin and special symbol for every phenomenon; whether it is prehistoric pottery, a statue, painting, etc. or it is a museum building, including a house, bridge, bath, etc. Also, museums can show the repetition of cosmogenesis at first glance, because museum works are considered a type of creation, most of which are related to myths, whether it is a carpet with mythological motifs, pottery with the pattern of the tree of life, or an icon of the Holy Mary. Also, the external structure and architecture of some museums are a type of creation based on mythological archetypes. The museum is also re-defining and giving birth to itself in a constant encounter with novel works and ordering the chaos existing among the works, and it can be called a very small version of the world's creation.
On the other hand, a museum is a place whose duty is to remind the existence and identity of the human being; that is, it benefits from the beginnings and origins, and with this hope, he takes the works and objects and displays them. In this sense, the object in the museum environment becomes a symbolic and mythical medium that provides a way to escape from the present and this escape is deeper when it takes the form of returning to the beginning. In fact, in the museum, a person achieves a kind of "escape from time" and is freed from personal and historical time. The Museum is also a reminder of the beginning of time by including tangible and intangible works related to periodical celebrations and ceremonies such as New Year and rituals such as wars and battles. In another view, the museum is also enclosed like holy places, and due to this demarcation, it is separated from the unholy world. Also, the museum building often has a route and sequence of entry or threshold and special conditions for entry; in fact, passing through it requires compliance with rules such as buying a ticket, not bringing a camera, food, etc. and entering it means accepting a different situation. In addition, as a place of comfort, relaxation, and education, it requires covenants about sound, silence, restraint, attention, and full awareness, which well reflects a kind of sanctification of the place. However, it does not force anyone to perform religious duties or repent. According to the mentioned characteristics, the museum can be considered a holy place based on the mythological model of Eliade. The general patterns of the museum are pregnant with values and characteristics such as the manifestation of the sacred, the connecting center, the repetition of the cosmological archetype, the experience of the beginning time, and having borders and passages, as a result, it can revive the experience of the "holy place" even for non-religious people.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Mircea Eliade
  • Myth
  • Holy Place
  • Museum
الیاده، میرچا (1393) چشم‌اندازهای اسطوره، ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، تهران: توس.
________(1394) رساله‌ در تاریخ ادیان، ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، تهران:  سروش.
________(1394) «معماری قدسی و رمزپردازی» در اسطوره و رمز در اندیشۀ میرچا الیاده از مجموعۀ جهان اسطوره‌شناسی(6)، ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، تهران: نشر مرکز.
________ (1398) نمادپردازی امر قدسی و هنرها، ترجمۀ محمدکاظم مهاجری، تهران: کتاب پارسه.
________ (1399) مقدس و نامقدس، ترجمۀ نصرالله زنگوئی، تهران: سروش.
________ (1400) اسطوره و واقعیت، ترجمۀ مانی صالحی علامه، تهران: کتاب پارسه.
امامی، صابر (1381) اساطیر در متون تفسیری فارسی، تهران: گنجینۀ فرهنگ.
ایمانیان نجف‌آبادی، ملیحه؛ حسامی کرمانی، منصور (1397) ««طبیعت» تجلی مکان مقدس در نگارگری ایران بازتاب کهن‌الگوی ایرانی «زمین» و «کوه» در نگارگری ایران با کمک از آرای میرچا الیاده»، نگره، 13(47)، 131-145.
پالس، دانیل (1394) هفت نظریه در باب دین، ترجمۀ محمد عزیز بختیاری، قم: مرکز انتشارات مؤسسۀ آموزشی امام خمینی(ره).
پرتوی، پروین (1394) پدیدارشناسی مکان، تهران: نشر متن.
جنویز، هیو. هـ (1398) فلسفۀ موزه برای قرن بیست‌ویکم، ترجمۀ کورس سامانیان و مریم الماسی، تهران: حکمت.
حکمت، مرضیه (1398) تجربۀ بازدیدکنندۀ موزه در مکان مقدس (موردپژوهی: موزه‌های موجود در حرم‌مطهر امام‌رضا(ع))، رسالۀ دکتری رشتۀ تاریخ تطبیقی و تحلیلی هنر اسلامی، دانشگاه هنر تهران.
حکمت، مرضیه؛ پرتوی، پروین (1400) «خوانش تجربۀ بازدیدکنندۀ موزه در مکان مقدس (موردپژوهی: موزه‌های حرم‌مطهر رضوی)»، خراسان بزرگ، 11(42)، 63-84.
خان‌محمدی، کریم (1400) «بررسی پدیدارشناختی پنجرۀ فولاد مشهدالرضا (ع)»، فرهنگ رضوی، 9(35)، 123-152.
دورانت، ویل (1399) تاریخ تمدن، جلد5، ترجمۀ ابوطالب صارمی، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
رز، ژیلیان (1398) روش و روش‌شناسی تحلیل تصویر، ترجمۀ سید جمال‌الدین اکبرزاده جهرمی، تهران: نشر پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات؛ مرکز پژوهش و سنجش افکار صداوسیما.
ریس، ژولین (1394) «تاریخ ادیان، پدیدارشناسی، هرمنوتیک» در اسطوره و رمز در اندیشۀ میرچا الیاده، از مجموعۀ جهان اسطوره‌شناسی (6)، ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، تهران: نشر مرکز.
سیدی، چنور؛ سیدی، فاطمه (1399) «تجلی کهن‌الگوی قهرمان در نگارۀ جام زرین حسنلو (عصر آهن) بر اساس رویکرد جوزف کمبل»، گرافیک و نقاشی، 3(5)، 128-140.
شمسایی، الهام (1393) «تمثل مکان مقدس و مثالی در عناصر فرش ایرانی با نگاهی نمادشناسانه و اسطوره‌محور به حضور کنگ‌دژ در نقش‌مایه‌های فرش ایرانی»، گلجام،10(26)، 5-14.
طاهری، صدرالدین (1399) «تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی دگرگونی تاریخی در مکان پاسداشت شیء مقدس»، جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی، 12(2)، 364-342.  
کینگ، وینستون (1389) «دین» در دین‌پژوهی، ترجمۀ بهاءالدین خرمشاهی، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم‌انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
محسنیان‌راد، مهدی؛ باهنر، ناصر (1390) «هنجارهای مرتبط با مکان‌ها و زمان‌های مقدس در سه کتاب مقدس»، الهیات تطبیقی، 2(5)، 35-72.
منصورزاده، یوسف؛ حاتمی، ابوالقاسم (1396) مبانی موزه‌داری، تهران: سمت.
ناصری‌پور، محمد (1378) «تاریخ معماری موزه‌ها»، ویژه‌نامۀ همایش موزه و توسعۀ فرهنگی، 22، 59-62.
همیلتون، ادیت (1400) سیری در اساطیر یونان و روم، ترجمۀ عبدالحسین شریفیان، تهران: اساطیر.
هایدگر، مارتین (1398) «ساختن، باشیدن، اندیشیدن»، در مجموعۀ هرمنوتیک مدرن: گزینۀ جستارها، ترجمۀ بابک احمدی و دیگران، تهران: نشر مرکز.
یادگاری، سمیه (1386) از معنا تا مکان (موزۀ ادیان-طراحی فضای مقدس)، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد معماری، پردیس هنرهای زیبا دانشگاه تهران.
 
 
References
-Barrie, T. (1996). Spiritual Path, Sacred Place, Myth, Ritual, and Meaning in Architecture, Boston: Shambhala.
-Buggeln, G. Paine, C. Brent Plat, S. (2017). Religion in Museums Global And Multidisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
-De Morgan, J. (1997). Mémoires de Jacques de Morgan 1857-1924, Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
-Durant, W. (2019), The Story of Civilization, (Vol. 5), (17th ed.), Translated by Abutaleb Saremi, Tehran: Elmifarhangi (Text in Persian).
-Emami, S. (2003). Mythology in Persian Interpretative Texts, Tehran: Ganjinefarhang (Text in Persian).
-Eliade, M. (1954(. The Myth of the Eternal Return or Cosmos and History, Princeton University Press.
-Eliade, M. (1957), The Sacred and the Profane; The Nature of Religion, (Willard R. Trask, Translator), United States of America: Harcourt Brace & Company.
-Eliade, M. (1987). Encyclopedia of Religion, Macmillan Publishing Company.
-Eliade, M. (2014). Aspects du Mythe, (3rded.), Translated by Jalal Sattari, Tehran: Toos (Text in Persian).
-Eliade, M. (2015). Treatise on the History of Religions, (5th ed.), Translated by Jalal Sattari, Tehran: soroush (Text in Persian).
-Eliade, M. (2015). Myth and Mystery in Iliad Thought, (5th ed.), Translated by Jalal sattari, Tehran: Markaz (Text in Persian).
-Eliade, M. (2019), Symbolism, the Sacred and the Arts, (2nded.), Translated by Mohammad kazem Mohajeri, Tehran: Ketabeparseh (Text in Persian).
-Eliade, M. (2020). The Sacred and the Profane, (4th ed), Translated by Nasrallah Zangoui, Tehran: soroush (Text in Persian).
-Eliade, M. (2021). Myth and Reality, (6th ed.), Translated by Mani Salehi Allameh, Tehran: Ketabeparseh (Text in Persian).
-Genoways, H. (2019). Museum Philosophy for the Twenty-First Century, Translated by Kouros Samanian and Maryam Almasi, Tehran: Hekmat (Text in Persian).
-Hekmat, M. (2019). Museum Visitor Experience in The Sacred Places (Case Study: Museums of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (A.S.)), Thesis for Phd Degree in Comparative and Analytic History of Islamic Art, University of Art, Tehran, Iran (Text in Persian).
-Hekmat, M. Partovi, P. (2021). Museum Visitor Live Experience Reading in Sacred Place (case study: Imam Reza Holy Shrine museums), Journal of Greater Khorasan, 11(42), 63-84 (Text in Persian).
-Hamilton, E.(2020). Mythology: Timeless Tales of Gods and Heroes, (6th ed.), Translated by Abdul Hussein Sharifian, Tehran: Asatir (Text in Persian).
-Heidegger, M. (2018). Building Dwelling, Thinking, Modern Hermeneutics: Selected Essays, (13th ed.), Translated by Babak Ahmadi Et al., Tehran: Markaz (Text in Persian).
- Imaneian Najafabadi, M., & Hessami Kermani, M. (2018). “Nature”, the Manifestation of Sacred Place in Persian Painting Reflection of the Iranian Archetypes of "Land" and "Mountain" in Persian Painting With the Help of Mircea Eliade's Views, Negareh Journal, 13(47), 131-145. doi: 10.22070/negareh.2018.3172.1878 (Text in Persian).
-Khanmohammadi, K. (2020) Phenomenological Study of Steel Window of Mashhad al-Riḍā (as), Journal of Razavi Culture, 9(35), 123-152 (Text in Persian).
-King, W. (2010), Religion, Study of Religion, Translated by Bahauddin Khorramshahi, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (Text in Persian).
-Kopytoff, I. (1986). The Cultural Biography Of Things: Commoditization As Process In: Appadurai, A (Ed.) The Social Life Of Things:Commodities In Cultural Perspective.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-91.
-Mairesse, F. (2018), Museology and the Sacred, Papers from the ICOFOM the symposium held in Tehran, Iran.
-Mohsenian, M. Bahonar, N. (2010). Relevant Norms of Holy Places and Times in Three Sacred Books, Journal of Comparative Theology, 2(5), 35-72 (Text in Persian).
-Mansoorzadeh, Y., Hatami, A. (2017). Principles of Museum Curatorship, Tehran: SAMT (Text in Persian).
-Nixon, Sh. (2012), Faith in a Glass Case: Religion in Canadian Museums, Thesis for Phd Degree in Religion and Classics, Faculty of Arts, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
-Norberg-Schulz, C. (1997), The Phenomenon of Place, New York: Princeton Architectural press.
-Nasseripour, M. (1999). History of Museum Architecture, Museum and Development, 22, 59-62 (Text in Persian)
-Partovi, P. (2015). Phenomenology of Place, (3rd ed.), Tehran: Matn (Text in Persian).
-Pals, D. (2015). Seven Theories of Religioun, Translated by Mohammad Aziz Bakhtiari, Ghom: Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute (Text in Persian).
-Proust, M. (1960). Within a Budding Grove, Trans.C.K. Scott Moncrieff, London: Chatto.
-Paine, C. (2000). Godly Things: Museums, Objects and Religion, London: Leicester University Press.
-Paine, C. (2013). Religious Objects in Museums Private Lives and Public Duties, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
-Rose, G. (2019), Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, Translated by Seyed Jamaluddin Akbarzadeh Jahromi, Tehran: Research Center for Culture, Art And Communications (Text in Persian).
-Ries, J. (2015), History of Religions, Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, in Myth and Mystery in Iliad Thought, (5th ed.), Translated by Jalal sattari, Tehran: Markaz (Text in Persian).
-Roque, M. I. R. (2010), Comunicação no Museu. In Benchetrit, S. Zamorano, R. B. Magalhães, A. M. Museu e Comunicação: exposição como objeto de estudo (pp. 47-68). Rio de Janeiro: Museu Histórico Nacional.
-Relph, E. (1976), Place and Placelessness, London: Pion.
-Scheiner, T. (2018), Muséologie, Musée, Sacré et Profane: hiérophanies, Museology, Museum, Sacred and Profane: Hierophanies, Published in Paris, ICOFOM.
-Shamsaei, E. (2015), Manifestation of Ideal and Sacred Place among the Elements of Persian Carpet with an Emphasize on the Presence of Kang Dej in Motifs of Persian Carpet Using Symbolistic and Mythological Approach, Goljaam, 10 (26), 5-14 (Text in Persian).
- Saidi, C., & Saidi, F. (2021). The Archetype of Hero archetype in the Hasanlu Golden Cup Gallery (age of iron) Based on joseph Campbell's Approach, Painting Graphic Research, 3(5), 128-140. doi: 10.22051/pgr.2021.34094.1094 (Text in Persian).
- Taheri S. (2021). Historical Variation of Safeguarding places for the Sacred Object, a Sociological Analysis, MJSS, 12 (2) :341-364 (Text in Persian).
-Woolley, L. Mallowan, M.E.L. (1962). Ur Excavations, The Neo-Babylonian and Persian Periods, (Vol. 9) (Archaeology).
-Yadegaryi, S. (2008). From Incorporeity to Place (Museum of Religions), Thesis for M.A Degree in Architecture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Text in Persian).
URL(s)
URL1: https://artthescience.com/blog/2016/01/19/spaces-artscience-museum/
URL2: https://b2n.ir/a68730
URL3: http://honarkhan.com/mag/
URL4: http://insideinside.org/project/solomon-r-guggenheim-museum-new-york/
URL7: https://upwikifa.top/wiki/choijin_lama_temple